Skip to main content

As we navigate through 2023, the pandemic’s impacts have settled into a new norm, placing business leaders at a crucial juncture concerning the future of work. The debate centres around whether to continue with remote work, revert to traditional in-office settings, or implement a hybrid model. Companies and their employees are sharply divided on this issue, making it a subject that begs for nuanced exploration.


The Great Return: Companies Bidding Farewell to Remote Work

As of 2023, a host of prominent companies have decided to shift back to in-person work. These include corporate giants like Starbucks, General Motors, Disney, Walmart, Dell, Amazon, Activision Blizzard, United Parcel Service (UPS), Meta, and Grindr. Each company has developed a unique approach to this transition:

  • Starbucks: Imposed a three-day minimum in-office policy, with CEO Howard Schultz emphasizing the need to rebuild company culture.
  • General Motors (GM): Planning for an average three-day-a-week return for its 53,000 salaried employees, with a willingness to adapt based on feedback.
  • Disney: Mandated a four-day-a-week in-person work schedule, focusing on fostering creativity and culture despite some employee resistance.
  • Walmart: Requires white-collar workers to return for two days a week and some to relocate, showcasing its innovative approach to workforce management.
  • Dell: After layoffs, now requires employees living within an hour’s commute to return for three days a week, reversing its earlier pro-WFH stance.
  • Amazon: Maintains a three-day in-office policy despite internal resistance, emphasizing alignment with corporate objectives.
  • Activision Blizzard: Has planned phased returns for its two main branches, despite objections from various stakeholders like game producers.
  • UPS: Adopts a three-day in-office policy based on employee feedback, also making office improvements to facilitate the transition.
  • Meta (Formerly Facebook): Requires three-day in-person attendance, aligning itself with broader industry trends despite its prior advocacy for remote work.


Grindr: A Case Study in the Return-to-Office Controversy

Grindr, the LGBTQ dating app, provides a stark example of the controversies and risks surrounding return-to-office mandates. On August 4, the company announced that employees had two weeks to decide between relocating to a newly designated “hub” city to work in-person twice a week or leave the company with severance. This resulted in a significant loss of human capital, with nearly half of its 178 employees choosing to resign.

This drastic reduction in staff came just as employees were launching attempts to unionize, a move labelled by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) as retaliatory, intended to squelch discussions of unionization. The CWA has since filed legal actions, highlighting how such abrupt corporate decisions can have complicated labour implications.

According to a survey by The Conference Board, 73% of organizations reported challenges in bringing workers back, and 71% that mandated on-site work found it challenging to retain staff. This data underscores Grindr’s case as a cautionary tale for companies making abrupt policy changes without considering their impact on human capital.


The Holdouts and the Hybrid Models

While a slew of companies rush back to traditional office settings, others like Apple, Uber, and Salesforce are taking a more cautious approach. Apple, a pioneer in tech innovation, has also proven adaptable in its workplace policies. Responding to employee feedback and concerns about ongoing COVID-19 variants, the tech giant has allowed for an indefinite period of remote work. This approach provides employees the time to make informed decisions about childcare, housing, and health precautions.

Uber, the ride-sharing juggernaut, has likewise taken a nuanced approach. It has introduced a hybrid model that allows employees to work remotely but also encourages occasional in-person meetings for better collaboration. This flexibility has been well-received, particularly by employees with family obligations or long commutes.

Salesforce, a leader in customer relationship management software, has set a new standard with its “Work Anywhere” policy. It’s a tailored approach, acknowledging that not all job roles require physical presence. Salesforce has even retrofitted its offices to serve as ‘collaborative spaces,’ negating the old 9-to-5 desk-bound culture.


Remote Work: A Fading Trend or a Resilient Model?

As companies diverge on their return-to-office strategies, one must ask whether this is a verdict on the efficacy of remote work or a response to extrinsic economic and social pressures. High-profile leadership changes, such as Elon Musk’s recent takeover of Twitter, reveal how executive decisions can rapidly shift workplace dynamics. Musk’s influence has already led to significant organizational shifts, raising questions about the stability of remote work policies under new leadership.

Moreover, firms like KPMG have voiced concerns over remote work affecting the quality and productivity of work, often citing difficulties in team cohesion and knowledge transfer. These perspectives raise essential questions about whether remote work is inherently flawed or if these are merely transitional challenges that can be overcome with time and innovation.



The post-pandemic landscape is a complex web of uncertainties, highlighted not just by the policy shifts but also by the ethical implications these have on labour relations. Grindr’s example offers a cautionary tale, illuminating both the potential pitfalls and the unintended consequences, such as employee resignations and labour disputes. These are not merely policy decisions; they are actions that affect people’s lives, their well-being, and ultimately, the social contract between employers and employees.

As business leaders tread this uncharted terrain, their choices will cast long shadows over our work culture and labour market for years, if not decades, to come. The debate about the future of work is, therefore, far from academic—it is an urgent, vital dialogue that will define the contours of our professional lives for the foreseeable future.


Contact Us